What does James Earl Carter Know about the world?

Our 39^th President from 1977 to 1981 was a weak pacifists who directly cause most but not all the problems we have faced in the last 30 years.

Weak on defence

In the sector of defence, he departed from past policy and cancelled the B1 bomber project.

He also vetoed a measure for a $2 billion dollar nuclear carrier; Congress failed to override his veto. He also persuaded Congress to lift the arms embargo on Turkey.

Source: answers.com

Panama Canal

President Jimmy Carter, wanting to foster goodwill in Latin America, resumed negotiations and finalized two treaties based on the 1967 principles. The Canal Treaty prescribed twenty-two years for control to gradually pass to Panama. The Neutrality Treaty required Panama to keep the canal open and accessible. A “statement of understanding” permitted the United States to defend the canal “against any aggression or threat” but not to intervene in Panama’s domestic affairs.

 

Result

In the 1980s, Panama’s ruler, General Manuel Noriega, a former American ally, became increasingly independent and provocative toward the United States. He was also involved in drug trafficking and money laundering. On 20 December 1989, President George H. W. Bush ordered Operation Just Cause, which restored a duly-elected Panamanian, Guillermo Endara, as president but made the country a de facto American protectorate for several years. The United States ousted and captured Noriega just days before an independent Panamanian, Gilberto Guardia Fabréga, was to oversee the Panama Canal Commission for the first time. Ten years later, at noon on 31 December 1999, the U.S. presence ended in the Canal Zone, and Panama assumed full and total sovereignty.

Source: answers.com

Camp David peace treaty

Implementing the Camp David Accords, however, proved more difficult than Carter and his advisers had imagined. To be sure, the lure of a multi‐billion‐dollar U.S. aid package and the promise that several hundred American troops would monitor the Sinai frontier helped persuade Sadat and Begin to sign a peace treaty in Washington on 26 March 1979, and within three years all Israeli troops and settlers had departed from Egyptian soil.

Source: answers.com

Iran Cold War Ally

For several decades, the United States of America had been an ally and backer of Iran’s Shah, or monarch, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. During World War II, Allied powers Britain and the Soviet Union occupied Iran to keep it from joining the Axis, and forced the reigning monarch, Reza Shah, to abdicate in favor of his son.[3] After the war and during the Cold War, Iran allied itself with the U.S. against Russia, then the Soviet Union, which was Iran’s neighbor and some-time enemy and occupier. America provided the Shah with military and economic aid, while Iran provided the United States with a steady oil supply and valuable strategic presence in the Middle East, since Iran shared borders with both the Persian Gulf and the Soviet Union.

Jimmy Carter, upon becoming President in 1977, turned on the Shah by launching a deliberate and inexplicable public campaign to undermine his regime. The Carter policy of undermining our ally, the Shah, seemed to work in tandem with that of the Soviet Union. The end result was the establishment of a revolutionary Jihadist regime headed up by the Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. The Iranian revolution, besides enthroning one of the world’s most oppressive regimes, helped to build the terror network that challenges the free world today.

Result

Iran Hostage Crisis

The Iran hostage crisis began November 4, 1979, when a mob of Iranians seized the U.S. embassy in Tehran, taking a large group of employees hostage. Eleven months earlier, a revolution led by the Islamic fundamentalist Ayatollah Ruholla Khomeini had overthrown Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the shah of Iran. Relations between the two countries had been strained since that time, as Iran’s new leaders denounced the United States for its longtime support of the shah. When the exiled shah entered the United States in October for medical care, many Iranians feared a repetition of the U.S.-assisted coup that had put the shah on the throne in 1953. The hostage taking followed.

Source: answers.com

As A direct result of Carters weakness in foreign policy:

Soviet Invasion of Afghanistan

At the end of December 1979, Soviet troops moved into Afghanistan, setting off an international crisis. The situation had been building since April 1978, when a coup led by the pro-Soviet Armed Forces Military Council installed a Marxist government under the leadership of Noor Mohammed Taraki. Rebel groups resisted, and fighting intensified. In February 1979, rebel forces kidnapped U.S. ambassador Adolph Dubs, who died in a shoot-out between the rebels and government forces. In September 1979, Taraki resigned after a bitter power struggle, and the government passed into the hands of Hafizullah Amin. After barely two months in office, Amin was replaced by Babrak Karmal, who had invited the intervention of Soviet troops and who was supported by Moscow. The Soviet government insisted that it was sending in a “limited military contingent” to repel aggression from abroad.

Source: answers.com

Détente Ends

Brezhnev’s foreign policy during the 1970s supported Marxist revolutionary governments in Vietnam, Angola, Mozambique, Somalia, Ethiopia, Grenada, Nicaragua, and South Yemen, but it stumbled in applying the Brezhnev doctrine to Afghanistan. A 10-year occupation of that country (1979–89) pitted the forces of the USSR against the same sort of indigenous, nationalistic guerrilla army that the United States had faced in Vietnam. The United States’ response to the invasion was swift; it shelved the second SALT agreement, suspended grain shipments, and led a boycott of the 1980 Moscow Olympics. The U.S. and European governments, despite domestic opposition, placed new intermediate range Pershing II missiles in Europe, and a staunch anti-Communist, Ronald Reagan, was elected President of the United States. Détente was over.

Almost in synchrony with the breakdown in international relations, the Stalin-era leadership began to fail. Kosygin resigned and died in 1980. Brezhnev grew ill. His declining health slowed the Soviet response to the 1980–82 challenge posed by Poland’s Solidarity union. Soviet economists, who had been secretly relying on doctored economic figures and raw material exports to gloss over the economy’s deficiencies, could not disguise the USSR’s failure to meet its Five-Year Plan goals. Fortuitous increases in gold and oil prices in the 1970s had camouflaged the decay, but the USSR possessed few manufacturing exports, the lifeblood of all developing economies. Life expectancy for men began to decline due to alcohol abuse, a fact so embarrassing to the government that it stopped issuing life expectancy figures.

Source: answers.com

The end of pacifism.

Once Again strength returned to The United states.

As a result the Soviet Union as we knew it fell apart freedom became the the focus.

War had been waged against the United States By both the Ayatollah Ruholla Khomeini and Osama Bin Laden and indirectly by every Muslim country in the World.

In the early 1990s Carter brought messages from Somali warlord Mohamed Farrah Aidid to President Clinton which helped avoid a military confrontation and in June 1994 Carter negotiated with North Korean dictator Kim Il Sung to freeze his country’s nuclear program and allow inspection of their nuclear facilities. Interestingly enough, sometimes Carter’s efforts haven’t been completely appreciated. President Clinton was reportedly incensed at Carter going over his head in foreign matters and making statements that he wasn’t authorized to make.

Source: answers.com

Jimmy Carter: American Revolution Was ‘Unnecessary’

‘A Little More Sensitive’

Well, one parallel is that the Revolutionary War, more than any other war up until recently, has been the most bloody war we’ve fought. I think another parallel is that in some ways the Revolutionary War could have been avoided. It was an unnecessary war.

Source: newsmax.com

Ex-President Slams Blair Over Iraq

Tony Blair has been berated by a former US president for his “blind” support of George Bush in the Iraq war.

Jimmy Carter - a liberal Democrat who was in the White House from 1977-81 - said it had been a “major tragedy for the world”.

The outgoing Prime Minister’s relationship with President George Bush appeared to have been “subservient” and “abominable”, according to Mr Carter.

Source: skynews

Carter is a man who believes nothing is worth fighting for, you can settle any dispute by handing out money and giving them what they want. Problem is the more you give the more they want. This is about power, not about whats right and wrong. The term Good and Evil Right and wrong. We cannot escape the truth there will always be evil in this world. The key to keeping peace is to enforce it with a big stick.

If you lay down your arms you will die like a fool.

 

Carter had the right Idea of peace and good will but you cannot impose peace and good will in the middle of a war. Yes there is and always will be war at any given moment. So when the great Peace maker comes and brings Peace then there will be peace until then there will be deception and terror wars and rumors of wars and NOTHING can change that.

Revelation 2:26-28

26And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations:

27And he shall rule them with a rod of iron; as the vessels of a potter shall they be broken to shivers: even as I received of my Father.

28And I will give him the morning star.